A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 27, 2018, at around 22:15, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices by the police officers, such as the slopeF of the Efers, dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant avoided the disturbance without paying the food value at the above restaurant, to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender and carry the Defendant on the back seat of the patrol vehicle No. 32 of G Abdo Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do, and resisting the above entrance, and thereby destroying the equipment used by public offices by walking the back seat door of the said patrol vehicle at KRW 170,500, the repair cost of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (as of the fourth trial date);

1. He's legal statement;

1. Each investigation report (Evidence Nos. 2 and 4) of the defendant and defense counsel asserted that at the time of the ruling, the police officer arrested the defendant in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an offense, and put the defendant in the back seat of the patrol vehicle by force, and that in the process, the body was immediately left below the trab, and the body was cut down in order to maintain a balance, and that there was no intention to damage public goods.

그러나 당시 피고인을 체포한 경찰관인 H은 이 법정에서 “당시 피고인을 현행범으로 체포한 후 순찰차에 탑승할 것을 수차례 요구하였으나, 피고인이 응하지 아니하여 피고인을 밀어 순찰차 뒷좌석에 태웠다. 피고인이 뒷좌석에 앉아 차문을 열어달라고 창문을 두드렸고, 문을 열어주지 않자 누워서 발로 문을 걷어차 ‘퍽’ 소리가 나며 차문 스피커 부분이 손상되었다. 이에 경찰들이 차문을 열고 피고인에게 수갑을 채웠다.”고 당시 상황을 상당히 구체적이고 명확하게 진술하였다.

There is no reasonable or contradictory part of the above statement in light of the empirical rule, and H bears the risk of being punished for perjury and false facts.