logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.03.10 2016고단5170
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months and a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Highest 2016 5170

A. (1) On November 27, 2016, the Defendant continued to take a bath to F, “I see this dog, spath, spathing, and spathing,” while undergoing an investigation on the assault case against E within the Guriri Police Station D (Gririririsi), which is located in Gurisisi City, and “I see this dog, spath, spathing, and spathing,” and the Defendant was under investigation on the assault case against E.

In addition, the defendant, from a slopeF, "I am son voluntarily accompanied, so I am home, and will be subject to an investigation later.

“The police officers are multi-bris,” even after hearing the word “F.”

Before continuing to engage in the bath theory “F on one’s own ship,” the embling F on one’s own ship, and the brupt F by cutting F.

(2) On November 27, 2016, around 01:50, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender under suspicion, such as the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), assault, etc., and caused the Defendant to wear a lock, and the Defendant was unable to wear a lock.

"A spits spits on the left shoulder of G, as the area of the said area is located in G, and the area of the said area is removed, and spits spits on the left shoulder of G.

(3) On November 27, 2016, the Defendant was transferred to H office of the Guri Police Station H office located in Guri-ro 359, Guri-si, Guri-si, 359, and then sold.

We complained of and brushed the vegetables of the Guri Police Station by taking a bath, such as “Flaps, flaps, children of the police such as this garbage,” on the part of the assistant I belonging to the Guri Police Station, and flasing the I into twice in order to cover the vegetables worn.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports.

B. Around November 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was under investigation at the place specified in the immediately preceding paragraph A-3 around 04:00; and (b) the case was examined.

With regard to the view of J, the victim K, who is the mitigation belonging to the above police station, will be openly able to take a large voice over about 40 minutes, such as “Is shot, Is son,” and “Is son,” etc.

arrow