logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.08.25 2015고정1167
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B as of August 28, 2013, Goyang-gu Clyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Jinyang-gu (hereinafter referred to as "601") No. 601 (hereinafter referred to as "601")

Since October 2013, Defendant A operated “D” business, and Defendant A is the owner of the above 601.

1. No person who intends to arrange, solicit, induce, or compel another person to engage in sexual traffic for business purposes;

Nevertheless, from December 21, 2013 to March 21:40, 2015, the Defendant: (a) installed five marina rooms with shower rooms on a scale of about 50 square meters at the above D business establishment; (b) installed three water surface rooms; (c) one shower room; and (d) hires two female employees, such as Thai E, on condition that 50,000 won would be provided out of 110,000 won for commercial sex acts received from customers; and (b) directed the police officer, who controlled the establishment of the above business, to 110,00 won in return for commercial sex acts; and (c) provided guidance to 2 marina areas using female employees E and Red Seas.

As a result, the defendant operated the above marina business, and arranged sexual traffic by allowing female employees and sexual intercourses in return for sexual traffic from male guests.

2. No person who is aware that he/she is provided for sexual traffic, shall provide funds, land, or buildings;

On November 19, 2013, the Defendant came to know of the fact that B, around November 2013, came to know from the Goyang Police Station, which was under the control of sexual traffic brokerage among businesses, on November 19, 2013, after being notified by the Goyang Police Station, the Defendant was obligated to suspend the provision of subparagraph 601 above.

Nevertheless, after November 2013, the Defendant did not discontinue the act of providing by maintaining the lease relationship with B and B 601, and B was re-controled on the charges of arranging sexual traffic among businesses in the above 601 around March 30, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant provided 601 rentals to B with awareness that they are provided for sexual traffic, thereby engaging in activities such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow