logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.11 2016고단108
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for 10 months, and by a fine of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

2. Defendant B is the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a sexual traffic business in the trade name called Suwon-si D, five stories, and the defendant B is the owner of the building in question.

1. Defendant A: (a) from June 15, 2015 to September 4, 2015, from around the said “E” to around September 4, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 80,000 to KRW 110,00 per hour from the customer when the customer was found; and (b) provided guidance to sexual traffic women, such as F, and the above customer by one room; and (c) arranged sexual traffic women to engage in the similarity act that enables the customer to take the sexual organ of the customer by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for business from June 15, 2015 to September 4, 2015.

2. From June 19, 2015 to September 4, 2015, Defendant B, despite being aware that the above Suwon-si D5 floor was used by G, a lessee, as a sexual traffic business establishment, he/she leased the said floor to G in KRW 15 million, and KRW 1.3 million, monthly rent, with the knowledge that he/she used it as a sexual traffic business establishment.

Accordingly, the defendant provided a building knowing that sexual traffic is provided.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A copy of the bankbook (B); and

1. A written notification (fourths);

1. A report of investigation (a lease revenue acquired by a building owner B);

1. On-site photographs Defendant B and defense counsel’s assertion

1. The summary of the assertion was that Defendant B leased d, five stories (hereinafter “instant store”) in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and that G was aware that sexual traffic intermediary activities were conducted at the instant store, and notified G of the termination of the lease contract.

Since Defendant A used the instant store from G to be a sexual traffic business establishment, Defendant A provided the instant store in the act of arranging sexual traffic since the Defendant was unaware of it.

subsection (b) of this section.

2. Article 2(1)2(c) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic constitutes “act of providing a building with knowledge of the fact that sexual traffic is offered for sexual traffic” as “act of arranging sexual traffic, etc.”.

arrow