logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.02.26 2015고단2234
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2015 order 2234】

1. From December 13, 2014 to April 13, 2015, Defendant A: (a) leased Nos. 201, 302, 303, and 304, and installed four rooms and one waiting room equipped with shower rooms in the size of about 34 square meters; (b) operated a commercial sex acts business with the trade name of “E”; (c) operated a commercial sex acts business with the trade name of “E; (d) employed a F, etc., who is a born country, on condition that a customer receives KRW 100,000 from a customer in return for the commercial sex acts, provided that he/she would provide an unspecified male customer with the sexual sex acts in return for the payment of the sexual sex acts.

2. Defendant B, as the former part of the above A, was aware of the fact that the said Defendant B was operating a sexual traffic business establishment as above, and, on July 8, 2014, allowed A to use No. 304 of the D building owned by the said Defendant.

As a result, the defendant provided 304 units that allowed A to use for commercial sex acts with knowledge that they are provided for commercial sex acts, and provided them to arrange commercial sex acts.

【2015 order 3637】

3. Defendant A, from June 28, 2015 to July 17, 2015, operated “E” under the 301, 302, 303, and 304 Goyang-gu Kuyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building D, 301, 302, 303, and 304, Defendant A employed two female employees, including G, who are born, on condition that 50,000 won out of 10,000 won received from customers would be provided to women of sexual traffic, and had them do a similar act in return for payment from unspecified customers of sexual traffic, thereby engaging in a business of arranging sexual traffic, etc.

4. Defendant B, the owner of the foregoing D building 304, who was notified of the fact that the “E” business place around April 17, 2015 was provided as the place of sexual traffic, did not discontinue the act of providing, but allowed A to engage in the business of arranging commercial sex acts again from June 28, 2015 to July 17, 2015, thereby allowing A to engage in the business of arranging commercial sex acts again under the above subparagraph 304.

arrow