The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this judgment.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal, the intent to provide a place of sexual traffic is sufficient to recognize the defendant with a place of sexual traffic, but the court below acquitted the defendant by misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination:

A. Article 2(1)2(c) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, provides that “an act of providing a building with knowledge of the fact of offering a commercial sex acts” constitutes “an act of arranging and arranging commercial sex acts.” In light of the legislative purport of the Act to eradicate commercial sex acts by blocking a supplier of commercial sex acts and an intermediate vehicle with the supplier of commercial sex acts and the legislative purport of the said provision does not limit the content of the act of offering a building to the act of delivering the building. In this context, “the act of offering a building with knowledge of the fact of offering a commercial sex acts,” “the act of offering a building with knowledge of the fact of offering a commercial sex acts” was not known at the time of the lease, but it was known by the investigation agency after the lease was terminated, and it continued to be leased without indicating the intention of demanding the return of possession of the building (see Supreme Court Decision 201Do6297, Aug. 25, 2011).

It is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

1) The Defendant from an investigative agency to the lower court’s court.