1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as stated in the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of “the plaintiffs’ negligence due to the failure of warning, driving, and non-performance of the duty of happiness at the time of entering the safety belt or crossing” to “the plaintiffs’ negligence due to the failure of the above circumstances” following the judgment of the court of first instance No. 3, No. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, this part is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The reason why the court should explain this part of the scope of the Plaintiff A’s liability for damages is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except that the part of the 3rd to 17th of the judgment of the first instance and the part of the 2nd to 5th of the 4th of the 2nd to 3th of the 4th of the 2nd of the 2nd to 5th of the 4th of the 1st of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 3rd of the 1st

[Supplementary treatment costs from January 29, 2012 to April 14, 2012] 3,051,285 won (the treatment and treatment costs, such as a pelvise, due to the instant accident, and the degree of injury of the Plaintiff A and the treatment progress, need to be used for a higher-ranking hospital in light of all the circumstances shown in the oral proceedings, such as the degree of injury of the Plaintiff A and the treatment progress. Thus, the lower-ranking hospital’s fee of KRW 2,415,00, including the fee of KRW 2,415,00, is recognized as the first-class hospital’s treatment costs.

B) Outpatient medical expenses: 90,846 won (the amount obtained by deducting 80% contribution ratio): 167,800 (the amount obtained by deducting 80% contribution ratio) total: 4,209,931 won (the amount obtained by deducting 80% contribution ratio). The Defendant should deduct the amount equivalent to the contribution ratio of Plaintiff A’s contribution ratio among 11,639,560 won for the medical expenses of Plaintiff A incurred by the Defendant.