1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim changed at the trial court, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The part of the decision of the first instance written shall be written by inserting "Plaintiff A" to "Plaintiff".

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, "Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A and shall be deleted."

The third three pages of the judgment of the first instance court shall be written by cutting the "Plaintiffs" into "Plaintiffs".

The "Calculation Table of the Amount of Compensation for Damages" in part 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Calculation Table of the Daily Retirement Allowances" in part 11, "Galin foreign and future treatment expenses calculation table" in part 12, and "Support Gu Calculation Table" in part 13 shall be replaced by the following:

From 3th to 4th of the first instance court's decision, the first instance court's 17th to 3th of the fourth shall be followed as follows.

“1) Personal information: To be recorded in the column of “basic matters” in the attached Form 1 calculation sheet of damages.

However, the Plaintiff’s name is presumed to be approximately about 15.688 years, which is about 40% of the normal person, based on the date of the physical appraisal of the party ( October 28, 2015). As such, the remaining name shall be deemed to be until July 2, 2031.

2) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was serving as an agent in the Smers Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Smers”), and the retirement age is 55 years old. Thus, based on the benefits of Smers from August 20, 2006, which was the date of the instant accident to January 8, 2029, which was the scheduled date of retirement, until January 8, 2029, the Plaintiff calculated the lost income on the basis of the daily wage (22th day of each month) of urban ordinary workers, who were 60 years old, the date of the instant accident, as of January 8, 2034.

From 4th to 20th of the first instance judgment. From 4th to 4th of the first instance judgment, the Plaintiff’s salary income of the Plaintiff was as follows. 3th of the Plaintiff’s salary, which was paid regularly, continuously, during a fixed period of time, overtime allowances, ability allowances, and operating allowances.