logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.05 2013나62215
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the appellate court's request for extension, and the defendant's incidental appeal are dismissed, respectively.

2. Costs of appeal; and

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the liability for damages are the same as the corresponding part of the “the occurrence of the liability for damages” in the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of the liability for damages, each of the relevant items in the separate list of damages calculation shall be excluded, and the claims of the parties shall be excluded.

Personal information: The basic information of the attached table of calculation of damages shall be as specified in the attached table of calculation.

(b) Funeral expenses: 5,00,000 won (the plaintiff paid 5,000,000 won as funeral expenses, which was arranged in the first instance and the trial as the fact that there was no dispute between the parties).

C. Limitation of liability: Defendant’s liability of 90% above 1

C. Reference

D. (1) Of the medical expenses of KRW 9,739,740 paid by the Defendant, the Plaintiff asserted that there was no or no contribution to the king as a result of the deceased’s death, and that there was no or no contribution to the king. However, according to the result of the request of the court of first instance for the examination of the medical records to the head of the Giman University University, the head of the Giman University Hospital, and the head of the Central University Hospital, the Plaintiff’s above assertion cannot be accepted, since there was 50% contribution to the deceased’s death.

마. 위자료 ⑴ 참작사유 : 이 사건 사고의 발생 경위, 망인의 연령 및 과실 정도, 원고와의 인적 관계, 원고가 피고 차량 운전자 B으로부터 형사합의금으로 3,000만 원을 지급받은 사정 등 이 사건 변론 절차에서 나타난 여러 사정을 두루 참작. ⑵ 인정금액 ㈎ 망인 : 43,000,000원 ㈏ 원고 : 2,000,000원 【인정근거】다툼 없는 사실, 을 제1호증의 기재(가지번호 포함), 제1심 법원의 이화여자대학교 목동병원장, 중앙대학교병원장에 대한 각 진료기록감정촉탁결과, 변론 전체의 취지

F. Accordingly, according to the theory of lawsuit, the defendant's KRW 49,500,00 = from the deceased.

arrow