(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.10 2015가합523734

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.10 2015가합523734

공사대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On June 24, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) with the Defendant, setting the contract amount of KRW 1,072,352,690, and the construction period from June 28, 201 to June 22, 201, with the term “the construction project for the construction project for the convenience facilities for subway 1 to 4 lines (stage 1)” (hereinafter “instant construction project”). The general conditions of the construction contract for the local government (Article 253 of the Rules of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security; hereinafter “instant general conditions”) are part of the terms and conditions of the said contract.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a modified contract at least six times as follows.

No change in the contract period as of June 22, 201 to June 28, 201, the first ground for the change of the contract period as of the date of the contract for the change (hereinafter referred to as "the first ground for the change") was to the effect that no change was made on June 28, 2010 to April 30, 2012, and no change was made on April 30, 2012. From June 28, 2010 to June 30, 2013 to June 30, 2013, there was no change in the contract period between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to the effect that no change was made on June 30, 201 to June 30, 201, to the effect that there was no extension of the contract period as of June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

The contract amount of the second modified contract for the extension of the construction period without changing the contract amount of the first modified contract without changing the details of the first modified contract: The contract amount of the second modified contract that would not be changed: No change in the cost due to the extension of the contract period of the sixth modified contract (from December 31, 2014 to August 14, 2014). The contract amount: The Plaintiff would not change the contract amount: the Plaintiff would additionally add the indirect construction cost due to the extension of the construction period to the Defendant on July 8, 2013 and August 21, 2014.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.19 2015가합523239

-서울고등법원 2016.07.19 2015나2073515

-의정부지방법원 2020.11.11 2019가합58438

-울산지방법원 2014.02.12 2012가합7799

-부산지방법원 2017.01.19 2015가합1041