A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2015, the Defendant is prohibited from receiving a loan because he/she is not insured against four times within the country, by posting a phone to the victim C.

In lieu of B, the principal and interest will be repaid in good faith to B with a loan of one million won.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, the defendant did not have the ability or will to repay the loans of the victim even if he received the above money from the injured party due to considerable debt at the time.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim borrow 1 million won from the well-dying Loans (States); and (c) received the money from the Defendant’s account from August 20, 2015 to the Defendant’s account; and (d) received a total of KRW 20 million from August 20, 2015, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by filing a complaint, a certificate of balance, a detailed statement of loan transactions, and a camera course;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommending punishment] There is no person [the person who is subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) of Article 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes (the scope of recommending punishment] [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant acknowledges each of the crimes of this case]. The defendant has no record of criminal punishment; the sum of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case is equivalent to the sum of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case, and even if considerable time has elapsed after each of the crimes of this case, it is not agreed with the victim; the defendant's character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered in the records and arguments, the