logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.05.17 2017고정219
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around April 7, 2016, the Defendant submitted a complaint to the public service offices of the Changwon District Public Prosecutor's Office (C and D) located in the Changwon District Public Prosecutor's Office (hereinafter "C and D") to the effect that "A and D have forged and obtained loans from the K Savings Bank in the name of the Defendant by forging and submitting documents related to the loan of the K Savings Bank in the name of the Defendant." On April 14, 2016, the Defendant stated to the effect that "C and D prepared a monetary loan agreement with the Defendant in the name of the Defendant and received loans in the name of the Defendant." On April 14, 2016, the Defendant stated to the effect that "C and D were punished by signing a loan agreement with the Defendant with the police officer in charge of the investigation of the Gyang Police Station and the E Team office and stated to the effect that "C and D obtained a loan from the K Savings Bank, and the Defendant had become aware of the loan from the K Savings Bank, and that it was punished by around 201-7."

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant continuously stated that “The Defendant’s signature on the Defendant’s written agreement on the loan transaction (State) loan transaction agreement, the loan transaction agreement for HK Savings Bank, and the CMS transfer agreement shall not be written by the Defendant,” and on September 21, 2016, at the 301 prosecutor’s office of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant’s signature on the Defendant’s written agreement is not written by the Defendant.” The Defendant stated to the Prosecutor G at the 301 prosecutor’s office of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office as above.

However, the Defendant, under the name of the Defendant, consented to receive a loan from a well-dying loan (ju), Abrop loan (ju), and HK Savings Bank, and signed each of the above loan documents directly.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed the above-mentioned crimes with the aim of having C and D punished criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Investigation protocol of the police in relation to C (including the part concerning the statement of the defendant, No. 35 of the list of evidence);

1. Each part of the protocol (No. 3 and 42 No. 42) of the police statements against the defendant;

1. Complaint;

1. Each loan transaction contract;

arrow