logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.11.07 2014고정640
국가기술자격법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operated B (State), (State), C, (State)D (former State); (State; (State; (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State);); (State;); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State); (State;); and (State (State); (State;); (State;); (State;); (State;); (State;); (State;); (State;); and (State;); (State;); and (State; and (State; and (State; and (State; and (StateY.

No person shall lend a national technical qualification certificate, nor use a career pocketbook from another person, or may lend it to another person's career pocketbook for construction technology.

From December 3, 2008 to March 8, 2013, the Defendant borrowed a national technical qualification certificate, electrical construction engineer career pocketbook, and career certificate of construction technology from 14 persons, such as the Z, etc. listed in the attached list of crimes, as stated in the part of each borrowed company as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AH, AI, AJ, AK, AL, and AM;

1. Each written confirmation of acquisition and loss of qualifications for health insurance, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the National Technical Qualifications Act and Articles 26 (3) 1, 15 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of punishment, respectively, and Articles 42 subparagraph 5, and 18-2 of the Electrical Construction Business Act, and Articles 42-2 subparagraph 4 and 6-3 of the Construction Technology Management Act, and Articles 42-3 of the same Act, the selection of each fine; 1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant, including the Z, has leased a certificate for a considerable period of time from 14 persons including the Z; and (b) the borrower also has a lot of borrowed companies.

arrow