beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of the legal principles, although the defendant made a testimony as stated in the judgment of the court below, he asserts to the effect that the defendant was only a witness to witness himself, and that he did not have made a false testimony.
B. The punishment of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment and the evidence duly admitted and investigated in the trial of the lower court as to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts and legal doctrine, it appears that C does not have any whistleping onto the floor of the launchinged floor or suffered an upper part of the body severely, and the Defendant may recognize the fact that the above upper part was made a false statement contrary to memory in the court, even without the foregoing.
1) On April 13, 2012, C filed a petition with the National Human Rights Commission on the grounds that C was subject to rescue from V, etc. by wearing tools at the office of the House of the Working Team of the Work force of the Macheon Prison. However, the National Human Rights Commission rendered a decision to dismiss the said petition on July 10, 2012 on the grounds that there is no objective evidence to acknowledge the content of the petition by investigating the answers, statements by reference witnesses, medical records, etc. of the net prison.
In addition, for the same reason, Korea filed a claim for damages with the Gwangju District Court 2012 A group of 48560, and on January 22, 2014, the appeal was dismissed on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the fact that C was subject to the request based on the results of diagnosis of CCTV images and C, but the appeal was dismissed, and the judgment was finalized on October 25, 2014.
2) On April 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) laid a hole with C’s launchings, and was brupted by C at the time of taking a bath on April 18, 2012 after four days from that point; and (b) it was found that C’s launchings were unfolded with two launchings since C shown the Defendant’s launchings.