The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the prosecutor’s grounds of appeal (misunderstanding of facts) the CCTV images of child-care centers recorded on May 2, 2016, the Defendant appears to have taken both sides of the victim F (or 14 months) and the victim’s face, and the victim’s face was found, and the victim’s face was found to have taken place, and the victim’s wife was found on the front side of the victim’s face due to other circumstances.

In full view of the fact that there is no circumstance to find out, and that the victim’s parents resisted against the victim’s superior wife, the Defendant sent the Kakao Stockholm message to the victim’s parents several times to the victim’s parents, etc., the Defendant may recognize the fact that the Defendant abused the victim as stated in the facts charged and abused the victim’s physical abuse.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment by rendering a not guilty verdict of the facts charged in this case.

2. 판단 원심은 ① F의 모 G는 경찰에서 최초 조사 시에 “2016. 5. 2. 저녁 8 시경 F의 머리를 감기던 중 F의 오른쪽 귀 윗부분 머리 안에 긁힌 듯한 상처와 함께 약간 부어 있었고 우측 관자놀이 쪽에 멍이 들어 있었으며 양쪽 귀 윗부분이 피멍 식으로 둘 다 멍이 들어 있었고 양쪽 귀 안쪽에도 피멍 식으로 멍이 들어 있었다 ”라고 진술하고 있고, 이에 검사는 피고인이 입으로 F의 양쪽 귓 볼 및 귀 안쪽 부위를 깨물어 신체적 학대행위를 하였다고

It was prosecuted that the entry of the defendant, who is an adult, entered the small 14 months after his birth, and left the upper part of F, is difficult to obtain the upper part of F. ② According to the anti- CCTV images around 11:54 to 12:15 on May 2, 2016, the date indicated in the above charges, the date indicated in the above charges, the Defendant did not seem to have a clear way to prove that the defendant was broken of F, and during the above period, H teachers other than the Defendant are against his own.