Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing the performance of official duties by the District Court, and on March 25, 2015, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the House of Government.

1. On June 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) boarded on the top of the steering force of F-si operated by the victim E (62 years of age) on the front of the “D Hospital located in Dog-si C” on June 10, 2016; (b) asked the Defendant at the final destination of the victimized party; and (c) on the shortest possible calendar distance; (d) the Defendant attempted to leave the taxi without paying the charge at a taxi operating without paying the charge, and (e) assaulted the injured party at one time on the right side of the victim’s right side with the victim’s alcohol.

2. The Defendant damaged property by assaulting the victim E at the time and place in Paragraph 1, and 2, as seen above, destroyed the front glass window of approximately KRW 500,00 in the market price by breaking the front glass window of the taxi owned by the victim, by putting the victim E away from the taxi, and getting the victim E in the front of the taxi in the string of the string and the string of the string taxi.

3. When the Defendant was arrested of a flagrant offender from police officers belonging to the Jung-gu Police Station G District Group at a time and place under paragraph (1) upon receiving a report from the victim E, and was arrested to board the back seat of the police patrol vehicle on suspicion of assault, etc., the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) on the back door of the police patrol vehicle, the Defendant opened the back seat of the G District Ha and prevented the Defendant; (b) on the right side of the G District Ha opened the rear seat; and (c) on the right side of the H at the time of taking a bath, she embling off the front face of the H at one time; and (d) was flicked.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement protocol with respect to the defendant's legal statement H

1. Investigation report on the E’s written statement (with respect to taxi charges);

1. Previous convictions in the ruling on on-site photographs, taxi fares receipts: A criminal investigation report (as a result of the search of prisoners, attachment of the ruling) and a response to inquiries, such as criminal history.