1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, around 00:30 on April 2, 2017, 2017, hereinafter “Defendant A”) boarded the head of the taxi in the short-term, short-term, long-term, long-term, long-term, long-term, long-term, long-term, long-term, used to take a bath to E without any justifiable reason while going to the head of the taxi in the first-time, long-term, long-term, long-term, long-term, long-term, and used to take a bath to E without any reason. Although the above Defendant demanded the above Defendant to leave the taxi, Defendant A did not comply with the request, but filed the said Defendant’s temporary report as a district of the original police station located in F in the original-si.

When H, who is a police official belonging to the above global group, takes a bath to E, Defendant A, by hand, dump of the above police officer’s breath, dump, and flab on several occasions, and flab of the breast part of the above police officer’s flab, obstructed the police officer’s performance of duties concerning the prevention of the crime and the handling of the reported case.

"2017 Highest 665"

1. Defendant A, at around May 28, 2017, committed assaulting several times, Defendant A, who was a public official belonging to the police officer of the Kuwon Police Station, who was called up after receiving 112 a report on the personal information of the said Defendant and the circumstances of the instant case, committed assaulting the said police officer’s back-to-date, thereby interfering with the prevention and investigation of the said police officer’s crime, and the execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case.

2. Defendant B, who is a public official belonging to the said police group at the above time and at the above time and place, tried to arrest Defendant B as a current offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties as seen above, and went beyond the floor of the said police officer’s arms. Defendant B, who is a public official belonging to the said police group, obstructed the police officer’s duty of arresting the Defendant as a current offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties by walking the right bridge of the said police officer twice due to the defect in arresting the Defendant as an offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 351"

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each police statement made to H and E.