A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on November 20 of the same year at the Sungdong detention center.

1. On May 20, 2016, at around 00:20, the Defendant issued an order to the pacter and the pacter, etc. as if he did not have any intent and ability to pay the drinking value because of the lack of money, at around 00:20, the Defendant placed an order to pay the drinking value to the victims D (25:00,000, the Defendant received approximately KRW 371,00,00 from the said victims, such as beer and knick, and the Defendant received an order to pay the drinking value regardless of the absence of such intent and ability.

2. The Defendant: (a) at the same place as the day set forth in paragraph (1) at the same time; (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant: (c) went back to the inside of the said victim’s main duties by putting about a large amount of 40 minutes to customers who had been drinking alcoholic beverages; and (d) the victim D ceased to do so; (c) the victim d’s “hump, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith; and frith, frith, frith, frith, frith; and (d) frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, and frith, frithed the

3. On March 20, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 01:35, at the center of “E”, as indicated in Articles 1 and 2, in front of the G police box located in the Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Western-gu, without paying the alcohol level, and arrived before the police box was arrested in the act of committing a crime committing a crime committing a crime committing a crime committing a crime committing a crime committing a crime, and on the ground that the police officer of the G police box, who belongs to the G police box, would be getting off from the patrol vehicle, he expressed that the Defendant “spawn of spawn” was “spathn of spawn,” and interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the escort of a police officer who wears his uniform one time at the port.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or H;

1. Receipts:

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as the results of the search of suspects, reports on criminal investigations (suspects, repeated crimes, etc.) and criminal history;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;