A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 28, 2015, at around 122:45, the Defendant:17, a 120-day front of the Suwonnam Police Station B District, which was dispatched to the site after receiving the notification of the assault, and when the Defendant was arrested a flagrant offender from the head C and the head D belonging to the Suwonnam Police Station B District, which was dispatched to the site after receiving the notification of the assault, the Defendant told the said police officer, “I would like to see the frib fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fri fi

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

2. When the Defendant was arrested in the act of committing an act of violence, etc. at the time, place, etc. mentioned in paragraph (1) and was arrested in the act of violence, etc., and was placed on the back seat of the patrol 33 (Evis-purd). The Defendant complained against this error, and damaged the back of the patrol 115,852, which is a public object, by walking even with the rear door of the patrol 115,852.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police against F, D, and C;

1. Written statements of G, H, I, and J;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts, patrol pictures and photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence shall be the sentencing range of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending sentence] and Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of the crimes committed by the defendant, the background of the crimes committed by the defendant, the degree of violence committed by the defendant, and the degree of violence committed by the defendant.