logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.03.30 2016고단7710
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 7710]

1. From March 14, 2016, around 04:00 on March 14, 2016, the Defendant stolen property worth KRW 1050,000,000, in total, on two occasions, including the theft of the victim’s possession, from around 70,000 to October 1, 2016, at the “E” clothes store managed by the victim D, the victim at Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, opened the above store entrance between the victim’s leaving, and intruded with the inside, the victim’s deposits, and then stolen the victim’s ownership.

Accordingly, the Defendant invadedd a structure at night, and stolen property owned by the victims at least KRW 10,50,000, more than twice.

2. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant attempted to steal an article by intrusion upon a structure, such as the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu F and the 1st floor victim G G, which was installed in the store, by the toilet window of the above store, in order to steals the article from around 02:51, around July 28, 2016, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime, but did not commit an attempted crime, even though he did not commit an attempted crime, even though he invaded on the structure, such as the daily list of crimes, No. 2, and No. 3, by the same day until 03:00 on the same day.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, invadedd a structure at night and attempted to steals the property owned by the victims more than twice, but did not bring about such intent and did not commit an attempted crime.

[2017 Highest 193]

3. On September 6, 2016, around 06:06, the Defendant: (a) did not lock the “H” that the victim I of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu F1 was an employee; (b) went into a door through a window; (c) 160,000 won in cash owned by the victim who was in the seat of the Kabter credit cooperative, was stolen.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment Nos. 1 and 2-(2016 Highest 7710)]

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Each statement of G, D, J, and K;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Protocols of seizure;

arrow