A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

171,215,193 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violating the defense justice is a person who operates a limited partnership E in Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, while the Defendant is a company that manufactures and sells water supply and sewerage pipes in G, etc. in Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do.

In around 2010, the Defendant agreed to receive certain amount of money equivalent to the ratio of the contract amount in return to the public officials in charge so that F can receive contracts for supply such as water supply and drainage pipes, which are ordered by FF representative H and original cities, from the public officials in charge, and F would receive money equivalent to the ratio of the contract amount when F would receive contracts for supply such as water supply and drainage pipes from the original city.

On July 30, 2012, the Defendant asked a public official in charge of the prime city, whose name is unknown, to receive the water supply pipes, etc. from F to supply the water supply and drainage pipes, etc. equivalent to KRW 120,822,00, F to the government-funded construction work. On November 30, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 24,164,400 from F to the private partnership E account in the form of a limited partnership company, and received a set-off against the Defendant’s liability for KRW 5,040,30 to the EF of a limited partnership company.

In addition, the Defendant asked from that time until September 2017 to be supplied with F’s water supply and sewerage pipes, etc. to the public officials of the original city, such as attached Table I, thereby allowing F to supply F’s water supply and sewerage pipes, etc. to the public officials of the original city over eight times in total. F to pay the F to F to E’s account in total nine times in nine times in total, in consideration of the price, the amount equivalent to F’s total amount of KRW 145,059,369, and was paid to F to F as the account of the limited partnership company, and was set off by the total amount of KRW 26,15,824 in total three times.

As a result, the defendant received a total amount of 171,215,193 won under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for the affairs handled by the public officials.

2. The Defendant’s occupational embezzlement is transferred to the J, K, L, and M’s account as salary, even though he was not an employee who would receive a regular salary from the Victim Company.