The defendant shall be innocent.

On January 25, 1986, the Defendant in the factory room purchased part of the D’s D’ (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by Sim-dong, Ham-dong, Ham-dong, Hamnam-do, and sold as KRW 950,00,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,

1.The cost of subdivision survey at the time of relocation shall be borne in equal terms;

1.Roads shall be paid to F from the boundary of E and F:

1. On January 28, 1986, the price was received in KRW 300,00 on the date of the contract, and the remaining KRW 6.50,000 was made up two copies of the contract in the name of C, stating the following: H, Hadong-gun, seller C, buyer, and livestock shed removal agreement within 1986.

The defendant stated that one of the above contracts for sale prepared as above should be kept, and as if he additionally purchased about 20 square meters of land, he stated the content of the existing contract in addition to the above land, he received the registration of transfer of ownership from the above land.

The Defendant, without authority, modified a copy of the transaction agreement in the name of C, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, by stating that “the boundary is based on E’s tap water, and approximately KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

On August 2016, 2016, the Defendant exercised the following as a document to a public official in charge of the above court who is aware of the alteration in the Jinju support 303 Jin-si, Jinnam-do.

Maz.

1. The contract for the purchase and sale that the defendant changed the gist of the defendant's assertion is consistent with C and the defendant's intention, and the defendant's additional statement is made with C's explicit and implied consent at the time of the change.