Text
1. The Defendant indicated on the attached sheet No. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 16, among the land size of 863 square meters in Gyeong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant’s purchase of land, etc. (1) D and E divided ownership of the upper part (D) and the lower part (E) of 863 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) located in Gyeong-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Gyeong-dong, Seoul (hereinafter “instant land”). D owned housing and livestock pens (hereinafter “D livestock shed”), and E owned housing and appurtenant buildings in an unregistered state. However, the specific location and shape were the same as the right side map.
(2) around October 17, 1984, the Defendant purchased the instant land and each unregistered building on the instant land from D and E, and had not completed the registration of ownership transfer.
B. (1) Around January 25, 1986, the Plaintiff drafted a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the following terms and conditions as follows, with the Defendant’s “as to purchase a part of the instant land (E sectional ownership) and unregistered buildings of E on the instant land (E sectional ownership) and D livestock pens.”
The indication of real estate: It shall be sold at the price of 9.50,000 won, including two buildings and buildings owned by E and one stable within the land owned by Dong-gun and Dong-gun, with the boundary of land owned by D and E, among land owned by 863 square meters in Seo-gun C.
1. The cost of the subdivision survey at the time of relocation shall be borne equally by both parts;
1.The roads shall be paid to E from the boundary of D and E;
1. The payment shall be received by 300,000 won on the date of the contract, and the balance shall be 650,000 won until January 28, 1986; and
b. The removal of the B buyer A's livestock shed from the Hadong-gun on January 25, 1986 is within 1986.
(2) After the dissolution, the Plaintiff removed the D livestock pens from the land of this case to the purchase portion (E-unit ownership). Around that time, the Plaintiff entered the “mark” at the end of the instant sales contract at the end of the sales contract and inferred the following contents:
(hereinafter referred to as “the drilling part of this case”). The boundary is based on D’s tap water.
approximately 20 20,000 won in addition to receipt
C. The defendant, on October 22, 1986, conducted the registration of ownership transfer and the registration of subdivision.