Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 29, 2017, the Defendant was driving a D car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 100 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.073% from the 100 meters away from the 100-meter section to the front road of the Incheon Western Women’s Hospital, which is located in the 586 Cheongdo-ro 22, Cheongdo-ro X-ray, as it was in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu.

2. The Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, such as electronic records, etc., and the above author’s electronic records, etc.: (a) while driving a D car at a place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1), when the Defendant was subject to the control of drinking driving to police officers, etc. at the police team E TeamF of Incheon Seo-gu, Incheon, which was under joint drinking control; (b) the police officer’s completion of the duty was conducted as if he/she was G and the date of birth was G for the purpose of performing duties; and (c) the police officer believed that he/she was affiliated to the police police police computer network to enter the results of drinking test and the personal information of the above G, etc.; and (d) requested the Defendant to sign the driver, and (e) requested the Defendant to sign the “G” electronic signature.

As a result, the Defendant forged the special media records, such as other person’s electronic records on proof of fact, with the aim of making business process smooth, and used the forged electronic records as above.

3. The prosecutor was indicted for forging a private document or exercising the above-mentioned document 1) The prosecutor then changed the indictment in this court after he was indicted for forging the original private signature and exercising the signature of the above-mentioned investigation.

The Defendant signed “G” in the signature column of the State Drivers’ Statement Statement Act without authority for the purpose of carrying out and exercising as G at the date, time, place, as described in paragraph 1, and as described in paragraph 2, and signed it to the said police officer who is not aware of the circumstances.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant forged or held another person's private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;