A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 20, 201, the Defendant forged the private document in question, and the use of the document in question, on December 20, 2011, prepared “D” and “D” written in the name of “D” and “E” in the resident number column and written in the signature column, and written in the form of “D” and written in the form of “D” and written in the form of a signature column with the intent to exercise the document by using the pen on December 20, 201, when the Defendant filed an application with two or more water purifiers, namely, the Defendant was found to have duly formed “B” and “B” in the name of “D” with the intention to use the pen.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of the “Leman(s) lease contract and acceptance certificate” in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. On April 17, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document, and the display of the private document in question, on April 17, 2012, prepared “D” and “D” written in the name of “D” and “E” in the resident number column and written in the signature column and written in the form of “D” and written in the form of “D” for the purpose of exercising one unit of the G building at two weeks, and in order to use the pen, the Defendant applied for the construction of the private document in question at two weeks, around April 17, 2012, and prepared “D” in the signature column. In other words, it appears that the Defendant: (a) signed a false rental agreement and the receipt thereof, which was written in the form of B’s name, to Cheongho, Inc., an air-type installation engineer of the air office affiliated with Cheongho-si, Inc., with which he was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of the “Leman(s) lease contract and acceptance certificate” in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

3. On May 15, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document, and the uttering of a private document, on May 15, 2012, on the home and telephone number of the Defendant I located in Yangju-si on May 15, 2012.