The defendant is innocent.

1. A violation of vehicle operation restriction at around 03:03 on May 14, 2005, which is a defendant's employee, [a summary order subject to 2014 high-class 280-Re-deliberation: 2005 high-class 2005 high-class 19598 on November 2, 2005] A's violation of vehicle operation restriction [a summary order subject to 2014 high-class 285-Re-deliberation: 2005 high-class 18041 on September 26, 2005] A's violation of vehicle operation restriction around July 12, 2005, which is the defendant's employee

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.