2014Gohap69 Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny), and Cultural Heritage Guide

Violation of the Code;

A person shall be appointed.

Kim Tae-tae (A prosecution) and Lee Jong-tae (Trial)

Attorney Park Jong-soo (Korean National Assembly Line)

May 9, 2014

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

One account book for the collection of seized crime (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Facts of crime

【Criminal Power】

On March 13, 1991, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On June 8, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a special larceny, etc. in the Daegu District Court’s sexual support, and on June 5, 2009, in the Daejeon District Court’s official branch, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) in the Daejeon District Court’s official branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon District Court on March 13, 201.

[Criminal Facts]

On July 2012, the Defendant conspiredd with B [the Daejeon District Court, Jun. 28, 2013, sentenced four years of imprisonment to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and confirmed Nov. 7, 2013], C, [the same day, three years of imprisonment with prison labor in the same court, the same day, the same day, and the same day] to steals cultural heritage in Japan, along with B, and C, with B and C, and C, with Japan, left the Republic of Korea as the Roman Island in Japan, before conducting a inspection, and returned to the Republic of Korea.

피고인은 2012 . 10 . 3 . 경 乙 , 丙 , 丁 [ 2013 . 6 . 28 . 대전지방법원에서 특정범죄가중처 벌등에관한법률위반 ( 절도 ) 죄로 징역 3년 선고 , 2013 . 11 . 7 . 확정 ] 과 함께 부산항을 출발하여 일본 쓰시마섬에 도착한 다음 , 범행에 사용할 차량을 임차하고 절취품을 담 을 가방을 구매하였으며 , 대상 장소를 둘러보는 등 범행을 준비하였다 .

1. An act of entering the same line;

피고인은 乙 , 丙 , 丁과 함께 2012 . 10 . 6 . 18 : 30경 일본 나카사키현 쓰시마시 미네 쵸키사카 247에 있는 카이진 신사에 이르러 , 乙은 인근 도로에 주차된 차량에서 망을 보며 대기하고 , 피고인과 丙 , 丁은 현관 출입문 옆에 걸려 있는 열쇠를 이용하여 시정 장치를 열고 산사 안으로 들어갔다 .

丁은 산사 안에 설치된 진열장 밑부분을 양손으로 잡고 , 피고인과 丙은 유리관을 들어올려 진열장 안에 들어 있는 일본 국가지정중요문화재 조3259호 동조여래입상 ( 통 일신라시대 작품 ) 을 미리 준비한 가방에 넣어 가지고 나왔다 .

2. Crimes against the duty danger and injury;

피고인은 乙 , 丙 , 丁과 함께 계속하여 2012 . 10 . 6 . 20 : 00경 일본 나카사키현 쓰시 마시 도요타마정에 있는 관음사에 이르러 , 乙은 인근 도로에 주차된 차량에서 망을 보 며 대기하고 , 피고인과 丙 , 丁은 시정되지 않은 출입문을 열고 관음사 안으로 들어갔

피고인은 관음사 안에 설치된 재단에 있는 현지정유형문화재 조8호 관세음보살좌상 ( 고려시대 작품 ) 을 들어 내려주고 , 丙과 丁은 이를 받아 미리 준비한 가방에 넣어 가 지고 나왔다 .

이로써 피고인은 상습으로 乙 , 丙 , 丁과 합동하여 피해자 카이진 신사 , 관음사가 각 각 점유하는 재물을 절취함과 동시에 일반동산문화재 2점을 절취하였다 .

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1 . 丁에 대한 제2회 검찰 피의자신문조서

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Requests for cooperation in connection with stolen cultural heritage of Japan, provision of the list of passengers, provision of the list of passengers, provision of the list of seized cultural heritage;

Transmission of the full protocol and investigation report (for e-mails received at the Embassy of Japan in Korea, e-mails)

1. Before judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to A judgment), and results of the search of prisoners;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The criminal records in the judgment, the frequency and methods of committing the crime in this case, and the defendant's cultural properties;

It has repeatedly committed the same kind of crime after the execution of punishment due to theft crime.

recognition of damps, in the light of

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of criminal facts;

Article 5-4 (1) and Article 331 (2) of the Criminal Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

Article 92(2)2 of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (General Movables Culture)

Rescamsation Points

1. Competition;

Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act / [Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny)] and each Cultural Heritage Protection Act

A crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) with heavier punishment

【Punishment】

1. Selection of penalty;

Optional of limited imprisonment

1. Aggravation for repeated crimes;

Articles 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act [the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the execution of which is completed on March 13, 2011]

Inasmuch as there is a previous conviction of a crime of thief in violation of the Act

1. Confiscation;

Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act

Reasons for sentencing

1. The range of applicable sentences: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to 3 years up to 50 years; and

2. Application of the sentencing criteria; and

[Determination of Type] Habitual thief thief thief thief thief thief

【Special Convicted Persons】

- Reduction elements: None

- Aggravations: where theft of special property is committed;

[Scope of Recommendation] Three to Six years of imprisonment (aggravating Area)

3. Determination of sentence: Three years of imprisonment; and

이 사건 범행은 피고인이 상습으로 , 乙 , 丙 , 丁과 함께 일본까지 건너가 일반동산문 화재 2점을 절취한 것으로 , 조직적으로 2인 이상 합동하여 이루어진 점 , 피고인이 직 접 이 사건 문화재에 대한 절취의 실행행위를 담당한 점 , 문화재에 대한 절도 범행으 로 2차례 실형을 선고받은 전력이 있을 뿐 아니라 , 동종 범행으로 총 5회 형사처벌을 받은 전력이 있음에도 누범기간 중에 또다시 문화재를 절취한 이 사건 범행을 저지른 점에 비추어 볼 때 , 피고인에게는 종전보다 더 무거운 실형의 선고가 불가피하다 .

However, the defendant has committed a theft as he or she has a strong radius with his or her mistake in depth.

The fact that cultural heritage is recovered shall be taken into consideration in favorable circumstances for the defendant, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined within the scope of the punishment and recommendation, considering all such factors as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime is committed, equity with accomplices, etc.

Judge Yellow-dong of the presiding judge

Judges Cho Jong-soo

Judges Jeong-chul

1) Recommendations for a crime of violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) are recommended for a crime of violation of the Protection of Cultural Properties Act (aggravating area):

Since imprisonment is more than 2 years and 4 years from June to 4 years, it is to refer to the recommendation of a more severe violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief).