Revocation, such as an order to return illegally received amount, etc. 2019Nu30234

A Stock Company

[Defendant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 et al.

[Defendant-Appellant]

The Head of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul Northern Site

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2017Gudan71423 decided November 28, 2018

June 13, 2019:

June 27, 2019

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the order of 360 days (from June 16, 2017 to June 10, 2018) against the plaintiff, both of the 30,534,90 won and the return order of 30,534,90 won and the additional collection order of 30,534,90 won.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal do not differ from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is re-examineed along with the plaintiff's assertion, the first instance court's judgment dismissing the plaintiff'

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

The presiding judge, the whole judge;

Judges Min Il-young

Judge Lee Jin-hun