beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,167,968 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from November 15, 2010 to November 7, 2014.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) On November 13, 2010, the Plaintiff was involved in the accident that took place on the road at around 19:00 on the road, and was transferred to Defendant B’s D Hospital.
(2) On the same day, the medical doctor affiliated with the D Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff’s symptoms by taking CT and X-ray photographs on the Plaintiff’s left side on the same day, and Defendant C, a doctor affiliated with the D Hospital, performed the Plaintiff’s hydrostatic and pin fixed surgery on November 15, 2010. The Plaintiff was hospitalized from November 13, 201 to November 26, 201.
(3) On August 25, 201, the Plaintiff sustained pains after the surgery, and was diagnosed by the E of the Madern University Seoul Specialized Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice. Around that time, the Plaintiff was hospitalized by the F and was hospitalized from August 23, 2011 to August 31, 2011.
(4) On November 13, 2010, 2010, the radiation photographs of the Plaintiff do not fit the heat between the second stalone and the middle stalone, and it can be deemed that there had already been damage at the time. The first, the second, the second, the fourth stalth stalth stalthralone, the middle rodlecune (form), and the other side's troke and joint and several liability (form) are likely to be damaged in the upper part adjacent to the upper part.
[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap's statements and images of Gap's evidence Nos. 4 through 6, 8 through 11 (including each number), the result of the court's request for the appraisal of medical records to the Korean Medical Association, the fact-finding of the Japanese Medical Association and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant C is a doctor who conducted a wrong diagnosis of the Plaintiff’s symptoms and performed a sacrife, and Defendant B is jointly and severally liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiff as the employer.
As to this, Defendant C shall be subject to the above hospital.