logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.19 2014가합11334
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 95,732,045 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from March 26, 2012 to April 19, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is the person who operates the E Hospital located in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D (hereinafter “instant hospital”), and the defendant C is the extra-presidential doctor employed by the defendant B.

B. (1) On September 8, 201, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the instant hospital with a flussium to the right, and was diagnosed with a half-yearly rassium in the right sul. Accordingly, on October 5, 2011, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the instant hospital and was hospitalized in the Defendant C in the instant hospital, and the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant C in the semi-monthly sulbrosis and the rasium sulin surgery on October 12, 201, and on October 12, 201, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the instant hospital, and was hospitalized in the Defendant C in the instant hospital, with the instant surgery on October 5, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant surgery”).

(2) On October 19, 201, the Plaintiff was released from the instant hospital on October 19, 201, but the Plaintiff received physical treatment from the instant hospital since November 1, 201, as there was a limitation on water-saving movement on the right slot, and as a result, the Plaintiff was under physical treatment at the instant hospital. On November 201, 201, there was an outbreak of pains on the right slot line along with the ppuri noise among the water treatment tools.

Therefore, although Defendant C continued to receive physical treatment, Defendant C complained of the pain and cirrosis continued on the part of the surgery, and confirmed on December 15, 201, the result of the CT photographing test conducted on December 15, 201, that the cT was cut off on the part of the surgery.

3) In order to prevent the Plaintiff from being subject to demotion, Defendant C shall perform the instant additional operation on a total of four occasions on December 19, 201, January 9, 201, 201, January 19, 2012, January 19, 2012, and March 26, 2012 (hereinafter “instant additional operation”).

In the process of the implementation of Section B, there is an additional occurrence of a stoke, stoke, stoke, etc., which is the next stoke, the right stoke, and the status of the Plaintiff’s right s to the right stoke has not been protected.

C. The Plaintiff’s physical condition, other than the instant hospital, is subject to additional treatment at the Indones University Seoul Baum Hospital, and at the small-scale hospital, etc., and the Plaintiff’s treatment is completed, but the Plaintiff is right.

arrow