Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Criminal facts;

A. Defendant A (1) on May 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) called, “E is engaged in job placement and does not remove money from it when he/she conducts a job placement; (b) in the conversation with F, he/she did not remove money from it; and (c) in order to remove money from this industry, he/she published a written and written complaint against the victim.” Accordingly, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact. (d) on June 6, 2013, he/she found the victim’s reputation to G, who was an engineer of the E, by telephone, from the top of the police station in F. E., he/she received money from the article to the article, and 500,000 won received money from the article.” (e.g., e., g., g., g., that he/she received money from the article to the article.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

B. On June 2, 2013, Defendant B told H, an engineer who extracted by telephone, “E works for a scambling engineer and remove money without giving money. Once a complaint is filed, the fine is KRW 500 to 6 million.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

C. On May 2013, the Defendants held that “E shall act as a broker for articles and shall not receive any money from the borrower while taking meals at a mutually unclaimed restaurant located in the Dong-gu Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu. Therefore, the Defendants filed a complaint by recruiting articles that do not have money.”

Accordingly, the Defendants damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

2. Determination

A. The facts alleged by the Defendants A and B1 regarding the victims are as follows: “The victims” arranging sofaging articles, and then as far as they were extracted from the Borrower.