Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the Austria representative under B.

1. From August to September, 2016 to that of the Defendant, the Defendant directed the Defendant at the Orstru where the Defendant is his representative.

C에게 전화로 “D( 피해자 E을 달리 부르는 이름) 와 F 지휘자 쌤이 그렇고 그런 사이라고 하는데 아시죠

The phrase “F, a male and female victim, made a statement to the effect that they are in a mutual relationship between men and women.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On October 2016, the Defendant: (a) was on the Vietnam-nam rice cafeteria, the name of “H” located in the Dong-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si; and (b) was on the clurnetist Slurnet Co., Ltd. at the above Austria-si.

I are in an internal relationship between D and F.

The phrase “, this is,” and “as such, this is,” was called “.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

3. 피고인은 2016. 10. 29. 10:00 ~11 :00 경 고양 시 이하 불상지에서, 위 오케스트라에서 첼로 연주자로 있던

J phoneed to the J, “The conductor F and D shall be aware of her death,” and the victim and F were said to the effect that “the victim and F are ties of a relationship.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness C and I's testimony;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports ( telephone conversations);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the content and method of the instant crime, the victim’s considerable mental suffering, the agreement with the victim or the restoration of damage did not occur, and the records and changes of the instant case are revealed.