logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.18 2015고정1057
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In the light of the foregoing, the Defendant: (a) at the influencies of the Gyeonggi-si, which was around the January 2013, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts with the Defendant’s husband’s friendly arrest D, despite that the Defendant’s husband did not have any influorial relationship between the victim C and the Defendant’s husband; (b) the Defendant’s husband

2. On February 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the place of influence, the Defendant, even though the husband of the victim and the Defendant was not in influorial relationship, damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out a false fact by openly pointing out false facts to the effect that “the victim was directly present at the family and influoring the victim. The family was destroyed by the victim and the divorce was incurred by the victim; and (b) the victim was born.”

3. The Defendant, at the place of influence on the monthly and non-defluence of 2014, damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out a false fact to the effect that “the victim is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person with a family.”

4. On October 2014, the Defendant: (a) around the French land; (b) even though the husband of the victim and the Defendant was not in incompetial relationship, the Defendant: (c) made a phone call to the G, the wife of the Defendant’s husband, who was the wife of the Defendant’s husband; (d) viewed that “Incompeting the South and the victim, she was coming from the apartment complex in Song-gu; and (e) she met at the H coffee shop.” (c) made a false statement to the effect that the husband and the victim “incompetial relationship is recognized.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police statement of C or D;

1. An investigation report (a statement and CD attachment), each investigation report (a voice file content);

1. Investigation report and reference witness F.

arrow