logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.12 2013고정2651
남북교류협력에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was the representative director of the corporation B, and the defendant B was a corporation that manufactures Cheongbain from the GIC in North Korea.

1. When Defendant A’s residents in South Korea intend to visit North Korea, he/she shall obtain approval from the Minister of Unification and shall not obtain such approval by fraud or other improper means;

C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J were aware of the defendant's and K University Eastbook so that the defendant can visit the GIC.

However, it was not possible to visit the GIC unless the persons and employees of the companies registered with the GIC are related to the GIC.

Accordingly, the defendant and the 8 persons of the above C et al. were registered as the above employees of the above B, who are registered companies of the GIC and recruited to visit the GIC after obtaining approval from the Minister of Unification.

around March 29, 2012, the Defendant prepared an application for visit to the GIC as if he/she was a B employee by using evidence pictures and personal information received from eight employees, such as C, through employees M, and submitted it through the Internet approval application site to obtain approval from the Minister of Unification.

Since April 20, 2012, eight persons, such as C, etc., shall be from April 20, 2012

4. By December 21, 200, as if he were the above B employees, visiting the GIC.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with 8 above C, etc. and obtained the approval of visit from the Minister of Unification in a false manner.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, committed the above violation against Defendant B, who is the representative director of the Defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the prosecution on M in the protocol of statement;

1. Each statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J;

1. Statement made by the police on the N;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to enter the list of visitors to the GIC;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Each inter-Korean exchange and cooperation.

arrow