Defendant

A and D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

Defendant

A, D, and C respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 21, 2015, Defendant A paid 200,000 won in return for sexual traffic after drinking with female employees L and alcoholic beverages at K amusement stations in JJ at the time of drinking, Defendant A engaged in sexual intercourse once by moving female employees L and alcoholic beverages to M.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

2. On August 28, 2015, Defendant B paid 200,000 won in return for sexual traffic after drinking the said L and alcoholic beverages from the female employees of the said K entertainment shop, and moved to the said Nel to the said Nel, thereby engaging in sexual intercourse once.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

3. Defendant C

A. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant entered the said K amusement station and paid 200,000 won in return for sexual traffic after drinking the said L and alcoholic beverages, and moved to the said N and provided sexual intercourse once.

B. On September 20, 2015, the Defendant entered the above K amusement place and paid 200,000 won in return for sexual traffic after drinking the said L and alcoholic beverages, and moved to the Pelel located in theO at a time of drinking and engaged in sexual intercourse once.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic twice.

4. On September 2, 2015, Defendant D paid 200,000 won in return for sexual traffic after drinking the said L and alcohol from the female employees of the said K entertainment shop, and moved to the said NNel to the said Nel, thereby engaging in sexual intercourse once.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement made by a witness L;

1. The respective legal statements of Defendant B and C

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant A and D

1. Statement made by the police with respect to L;

1. Copies of the respective police statements made against L, Q, R and S;

1. Copies of the books related to sexual traffic;

1. Defendant A, D, and defense counsel asserted that there is no fact between the Defendants and L, but there is no fact that the Defendants had sexual intercourse with L, and Defendant D has paid the purchase price.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, L, the witness, is consistent and specific from the investigative agency to the present court, and the Defendants.