logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.02.15 2016고단1600
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay a fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. From March to April, 2012, the Defendant paid 200,000 won to female employees H and alcohol in return for sexual traffic after drinking at G amusement stations located in F at F at the time of drinking and drinking time, the Defendant engaged in sexual intercourse once by moving to a mutual influence in leisure and drinking time.

B. On July 4, 2013, the Defendant paid KRW 200,000 to female employees I and alcoholic beverages in return for sexual traffic after drinking them at the above entertainment shop, and moved to the Kel in theJ at a flood time and engaged in sexual intercourse once.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic more than twice in total.

2. On February 24, 2014, Defendant B paid 200,000 won in return for sexual traffic after drinking the said I and alcohol at the above entertainment station, and moved to the said Kel to the said Kel and provided sexual intercourse once.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the Defendants’ partial legal testimony witness I, H’s legal testimony witness L, M’s partial legal testimony to the Defendants, the prosecutor’s protocol of interrogation of the police officer I, and the application of laws and subordinate statutes relating to the police testimony protocol to H, and I, and H.

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. A aggravated criminal defendant: the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants asserts that although the main points of the instant case are written on the date and time stated in the facts constituting the crime, they do not go to female employees and cartels or engage in sexual traffic.

2. According to the following circumstances, according to the evidence adopted and examined by the witness H and I as well as the testimony of the witness H and I, the statement of the witness who committed sexual traffic with the Defendants can be sufficiently believed. Thus, the Defendants engaged in sexual traffic with H and I.

may be appointed by a person.

(1) H and I shall N Defendant A.

arrow