Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay a fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2015, Defendant A paid 200,000 won to female employees F and alcoholic beverages at E amusement stations located in D at the time of drinking and drinking, in return for sexual traffic after drinking, Defendant A engaged in sexual traffic by moving her female employees F and alcoholic beverages to Helel located in G, and engaging in sexual intercourse once.

2. On October 29, 2015, Defendant B paid 200,000 won in return for sexual traffic after drinking the said F and alcoholic beverages at the above entertainment drinking point, and moved to the said Hel to the said Hel and engaged in sexual intercourse once.

Summary of Evidence

The examination of the Defendants in the legal statement of F of the witness F of some of the Defendants, and the application of F of the police statement protocol to F of the police interrogation protocol to F of the suspect interrogation protocol to the Defendants

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

1. On September 2014, Defendant A asserts that, although the main points of the instant entertainment are written on the basis of around September 2014, Defendant A did not go to the telecom or engage in sexual traffic.

Defendant

B asserts that, at the F on October 29, 2015 and the main points of this case, alcoholic beverages are written between f and urine, but no sexual intercourse has been written.

2. According to the following circumstances, according to the evidence adopted and examined in the instant case, including the testimony of the witness F in the judgment of the witness F, the Defendants may believe the witness F’s statement. As such, the Defendants may recognize the fact of engaging in sexual traffic with F.

① On December 2, 2015, F was investigated by the police, and stated the Defendants on the fact of sexual traffic. The time when the date and time of sexual traffic was stated on August 8, 2015 and October 29, 2015 is less likely to cause confusion as to whether sexual traffic was sexual traffic, when the time and time of sexual traffic was stated on October 29, 2015.

② The F stored the Defendant’s phone number, and, in particular, the F indicated Defendant A as “A5 Entertainment’s president.”