logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.03.16 2015고단1463
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant A are two persons who operate two amusement centers, including “F” and “G” in Jeju City E, and Defendant B are those who serve as the head of the business office of the above amusement center.

The Defendants: (a) decided to link the said entertainment business with the entertainment business by taking advantage of the fact that the said customers seeking to engage in so-called “second-class entertainment business”; and (b) decided that female employees working for the said entertainment business would drink with the male customers who have been engaged in drinking together; and (c) decided to arrange for commercial sex acts by allowing them to engage in commercial sex acts in the entertainment business near the said entertainment place.

According to the above public offering, Defendant A employed female employees who will take overall charge of the above entertainment drinking room and work for the above entertainment drinking room, and Defendant B had female employees H employed by the above entertainment drinking room in combination with I who worked for the above entertainment drinking room on July 9, 2015, and had her female employees H, who had been employed by the above entertainment drinking room, drink with I, and move to Jel 202 heading room near the above entertainment drinking room and receive 150,000 won for commercial sex acts by allowing them to engage in commercial sex acts. From May 12, 2014 to July 9, 2015, the Defendants arranged commercial sex acts by having female employees of the above entertainment drinking room receive 150,000 won per male customer from the above entertainment drinking room and arrange commercial sex acts.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts.

2. On July 9, 2015, Defendant C provided a place to allow I and H to engage in sexual traffic, with the knowledge of the fact that Defendant C, at the above Jur 202 heading room, in the Defendant’s operation of the above Jur 202 heading room, he/she provided the said place so that I and H may engage in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer with respect to K, L, H, M, and I.

arrow