logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2014고단9793
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B: Around August 31, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the Victim F (25 years of age) twice to drinking the part of the Victim F (25 years of age) within the main point of “E” located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, on the ground that the Victim F (25 years of age) returned to the latter.

2. Defendants: obstruction of performance of official duties and injury

A. At around 00:45, Aug. 31, 2014, Defendant B was arrested as a flagrant offender from the slope victim H (the age of 49) affiliated with the Seoul Central Police Station G District Group that was called to the site after receiving a report of 112 regarding the assault case described in the above 1.1. As a result, Defendant B got arrested of a flagrant offender on the charge of assault, Defendant B her hand carried out an arrest of the victim’s breath by cutting down the breath and cutting down the breath, thereby spreading the Defendant’s breath, thereby spreading the Defendant’s breath, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim.

B. Defendant A’s above Defendant A.

At the time and place specified in the port, the victim I (the 42-year old-age), who had been employed by the Seoul Central Police Station G District G District District G District of Seoul Central Police Station, helps the victim to purchase a slope H, thereby going to the victim, who was in a scambling spons that require approximately two weeks of treatment, and then was involved in the G District, and threatened the victim with the desire to “I will bring the case on human rights. I will do so until the end, I will put the victim on the right.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders and criminal investigations, and at the same time, the Defendant committed a brupt spons and spons in need of treatment for approximately two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of the police officer with F, I, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant B (Appointment of Fine) (1) The point of assault: Article 260(1)(2) of the Criminal Act is the point of obstructing the performance of official duties: Article 136(1)(3) of the Criminal Act.

arrow