Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won, and a fine of 3,00,000 won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On October 3, 2013, at around 10:17, the Defendant damaged the damage of property by going up to the victim D in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim D in front of the first floor of the F building owned by E, with the stairs from the building located in front of the first floor of the elevator, and without any justifiable reason, by walking down the lower part of the right door of the elevator at one time, so that the repair cost equivalent to 1.50,000 won is exceeded.

B. On October 3, 2013, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) reported 112 at the same place as the above paragraph (a) and interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention and restraint of police officers’ crimes; (b) at the same time, they interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties regarding the prevention and control of crimes; and (c) at the same time interfered with the police officers’ performance of duties for two weeks.

2. Defendant B committed assault by Defendant B, in his hand, on the grounds that he was arrested by a police officer as a flagrant offender at the time, time, and at the same place as in paragraph (1) and that he was arrested by a police officer as a flagrant offender.

At around 11:00 on the same day, the Defendant continued to threaten the police officers to have access to the earth's free will, on the ground that the Defendant did not take a visit from the G District in front of the G District in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that he did not take a visit from the neighboring building, and the end fire extinguishers at the end of 3.3km, which had been possessed by the police officers, was in two hands.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and restraint of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. The police statement of K, I, and H;

1. Each police investigation report;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Defendants of the pertinent legal provision regarding criminal facts: Defendant A: the Criminal Act, in light of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine (such as reflectivity, the promise to prevent recidivism, the fact that there is no past record of fines or more, and the agreement on the damage of property).