The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in this part of the facts charged, killed the victim by putting the door, which is a dangerous object, on the part of the victim, such as the statement in this part of the facts charged, and putting the victim’s arms against it, and there is sufficient evidence to support this.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground that there is no evidence to prove this part of the facts charged. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (fine 3,000,000) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. On August 2, 2012, at around 14:30 on August 2, 2012, the defendant of this part of the facts charged, the defendant tried to consider the issue of property distribution to the victim at the house of the victim D (the age of 83) located in Hasan-si, Sinsan-si. The victim saw him as a dangerous object that had been located on the bank, and punished on the day, and the victim gets her hand and her son her son, and her son her son her son her son her son her son her son, the victim her son her son was dead, and this son her son her son her son her son was dead. The court below duly adopted the evidence of this part of the facts charged by the court below, which found the victim's her 10-day son her son her son her son her his son her son.

Furthermore, this part of the facts charged is consistent with the Health Council, as to whether the defendant, who is a dangerous object, carried with him the above virtual body, and injured the victim.