logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2015.02.12 2015고단12
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant committed the crime of December 30, 2014, committed on or around December 30, 2014, discovered a female bicycle set up by the victim E in front of the “Dcafeteria” located in the Jeonnamnam-gun C, Namnam-gun, and loaded the bicycle by using any cres around the surrounding areas.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen one bicycle equivalent to 230,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant committed the crime of January 1, 2015: around 15:00 on January 1, 2015, the Defendant discovered a Leston bicycle in front of the ancient Do road located in Godo-namnam-namnam-do, Namnam-do, Namnam-do, where the victim was placed, and boarded the bicycle by using any cres around the surrounding areas.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen one bicycle which is not the victim's market value.

3. On January 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the victim H was posted in front of “G” in front of “G” located in the Namnam-nam NavyF on the street around January 2, 2015; (b) discovered that the key of the vehicle is posted to the said passenger straw, and opened a door front of the string of the said passenger string; and (c) did not discover money and valuables by following the inside of the said passenger string; (d) carried the key of the vehicle attached to the said passenger string in front of the said passenger string.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the key of the vehicle equivalent to 30,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

4. On January 11, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime of January 11, 2015, around 03:40 on the street in front of the “K,” the victim L was parked in the area, and discovered that the correction devices of the said cargo are going up and the vehicle is not corrected, the Defendant opened the front door of the said cargo vehicle and opened the front door of the said cargo vehicle, but did not discover stolen goods, thereby leaving the said cargo vehicle.

As a result, the defendant was aware of theft of another person's property, but he did not have stolen the victim's vehicle, but did not commit an attempted crime.

(i) the evidence;

arrow