beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties or may be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1-1-7, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 4, Eul evidence 5, Eul evidence 2-1-2, Eul evidence 3-4, Eul evidence 5-3-6, Eul evidence 5-8, Eul evidence 6-1-3 through 6-3, Eul evidence 10, Eul evidence 11-1, the market price appraisal result of Eul evidence of the first instance trial witness Eul, Eul evidence of the first instance trial witness of the first instance trial, Eul evidence of the whole purport of the pleadings.
Attached Form
Defendant B and Defendant C are married with each other, and each of the lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the lands of this case”), and where individual land is referred to as “each of the lands of this case,” the Defendants purchased all or part of the pertinent land after 1970 and completed the registration of ownership transfer by using a list number, and completed the registration of ownership transfer. Specifically examining the land of this case 1 on May 22, 1987, the Suwon District Court received No. 18960 on May 29, 1987 with respect to the land of this case No. 2 of this case under Defendant C’s name on the ground of sale on December 28, 1974, under the name of the same court received on December 31, 319 of the same month in the name of Defendant C on the ground of sale on December 28, 1974, and with respect to the land of this case No. 3 of this case under Defendant C’s name on March 26, 1972.
4.6. Receiving No. 4180, with respect to the land No. 5 of this case, the same court’s receipt of the same day in the name of Defendant C due to trade on October 8, 1973, and with respect to the land No. 6 of this case, the same year in the name of Defendant C due to trade on June 27, 1973.
7.4. Receipt No. 9351. As to the share of 7,330/7,830 out of the land No. 7 of this case, the same court under the name of Defendant B for sale on February 24, 1973.