Text
1. The motion for intervention by the Intervenor joining the Defendant is dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. Of the costs of lawsuit.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 7, 1972 under the Plaintiff’s name on the ground of the sale on December 7, 1972 by the Changwon District Court 12714, which was received on December 7, 1972. On December 31, 1971, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of the sale on December 31, 1971 by the above court 10044, which was received on July 6, 1973, and the land category was changed from forest land to forest land.
B. On October 26, 1994, the instant land was combined with D road 1,587 square meters and E road 1,884 square meters, and the relevant registry was closed among D road 4,760 square meters. On the registry concerning D road 4,760 square meters in the above D road, the registration of transfer of ownership completed under the above court No. 10044 on July 6, 1973 under the name of the defendant on the register concerning the size of 4,760 square meters was transferred.
C. Since then, the above D road’s 4,760 square meters was divided into 4,265 square meters as a result of a correction of the area. On March 20, 2008, D road’s 590 square meters and F road’s 3,675 square meters were divided into 3,675 square meters, and the above F road’s 3,675 square meters were transferred to the Defendant’s name on the register of closure on July 6, 1973 under the above court’s name.
Since then, the said FF road was divided into 13 square meters of F road and 3,662 square meters of G road on March 20, 2008, and the said G road was divided into 3,662 square meters. The registration of transfer of ownership was transferred to the above court No. 10044 on July 6, 1973 under the name of the defendant on the register on the register on the 3,662 square meters of G road divided into the above G road.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff asserted the cause of the claim does not sell the land of this case to the defendant, but actually manages and occupies the land of this case. As seen earlier, the registration of ownership transfer has been completed in the defendant's future with respect to the land of this case, and its land category has changed to the road. The above registration completed in the defendant's future and its land category have been changed to the road. As seen above.