Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driving the B-wing and C-1.2 tons of freight with blood alcohol concentration of 0.039% at around 0:30 on September 12, 2019, while driving the B-wing and C-1.2 tons of freight in the condition of alcohol, and driving the two-lanes of the two-lanes immediately preceding the Seomari 3-1 lane in the face of his aptitude at the two-lanes from the face of his/her aptitude, and allowing the Defendant to enter the said intersection.

Since there was a tri-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely enter the intersection by making a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle abundance and left and left well, accurately operating the steering and brakes, and observing the signal.

However, the Defendant neglected this and went to the left at the right edge of the military vehicle C(22 years old) driving by the victim C(22 years old), who violated a stop signal while entering the intersection as it is, due to the negligence of entering the intersection, and turn to the left at the front part of the above cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as light dump, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, injury on the victim D (39 years of age) in the cump base, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about three weeks, injury on the cump dump base, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, injury on the victim E (20 years of age), injury on the cump base, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and injury on the cump dump dump, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks to the victim F (21 years of age), respectively.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.039% in the section of about 4km from the previous farm of a dog farm, where the trade name in the guest opinion cannot be known at the time of the strike at the time of the hour of the strike at the time of the strike at the time of the hour of the strike from the Do of a dog farm to the snowmari 3-1 mn-1 mnent intersection.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;