logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.02.18 2018고단4360
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Public offering Relations” (hereinafter “B”) around the beginning of May 2018, the Defendant employed C as an employee of a sexual traffic business establishment, and C, upon the control of sexual traffic business, made a statement as if he/she was an actual operator at an investigative agency, and decided to take charge of business, such as advertisement of female sexual traffic employment and sexual traffic business establishment, upon the Defendant’s instruction.

Accordingly, the Defendant paid a lease deposit to a lessor of a building in a sexual traffic business establishment and C prepared a direct lease contract with a lessor, around May 30, 2018, the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Officetel E, and the same year.

6.5.Around January 6, 201, the above officetel F was leased to establish commercial sex acts establishments.

【Criminal Facts】

1. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any person having no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, from Jun. 21, 2018 to Jun. 25, 2018, the Defendant and C employed Thailand’s nationality G (e.g., H), and I (e., trade name J) of Thailand (e.g., trade name, H), which did not have the status of stay for job-seeking activities through name bromoer in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel as a female of sexual traffic business establishments.

Accordingly, the defendant and C conspired to employ those who did not have the status of sojourn for job-seeking activities.

2. 성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매광고) 피고인과 C은 2018. 6. 20.경부터 같은 달 25.경까지 인터넷 ‘K’ 사이트(L)에 계정 ‘M’를 이용하여 성매매 여성인 G, I의 사진과 함께 ‘A course 30분 원샷코스 80,000 @, B course 50분 원샷코스 110,000 @, C course 60분 원샷 원핸 80,000 @, D course 90분 투샷코스 160,000 @’라는 내용으로 위 ‘B’ 성매매업소 광고를 게시하였다.

As a result, the defendant and C advertised businesses that engage in sexual traffic in collusion.

3...

arrow