logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2021.01.13 2020고단3703
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 5,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From June 23, 2020 to July 20:25, 2020, the Defendant operated a commercial sex dealing business establishment with the trade name of “E” from Eunpyeong-gu Seoul and the first underground floor, from around June 23, 2020 to around July 20:25, 200, the Defendant provided that female employees, such as I,F, and G, who visited the said commercial sex dealing business establishment, received the payment of the sexual sex trafficking amounting to KRW 9 to 1.80,00 according to the course, and had them do sexual intercourse with the said male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. From June 23, 2020 to July 20:25, 2020, the Defendant posted an advertisement fee of KRW 200,000 per month on “H,” etc., an online commercial advertisement site, at a non-place from around June 23, 2020, and “E” COURS S (S) 30,000,000,000 S 11,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00.

As a result, the Defendant advertised the business places in which commercial sex acts or sexual sex acts are conducted.

3. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner having no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant employed each of the above terms on the condition that the Defendant would pay 60% of the price of commercial sex acts paid by customers if he/she works as an employee engaged in commercial sex acts in the capacity of visa exemption (B-1) around June 23, 2020, as an employee of Thailand who entered the capacity of visa exemption (B-1), as an employee in the qualification of refugee application (G-1-5).

As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each of the defendants, I, F, and G.

arrow