logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.06.28 2018고단1093
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of ten million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) (the defendant) is a person who operates a commercial sex acts establishment with six marina rooms and shower rooms, etc. on the second floor of the former B building in the Chang-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (the second floor of the B building in the Chang-gu).

From January 1, 2018 to April 18, 2018, the Defendant received 80,000 won from the male grandchildren who wish to engage in similar sexual intercourse at the foregoing business establishment, and had the Da (S), F (G), and H (S) of the nationality of Thailand, a sexual traffic woman, engage in a similar sexual intercourse by using the scambling of customers’ sexual organ by hand, and had the knisher, a sexual traffic woman, do a sexual intercourse with the above male guest. The Defendant received 1.60,00 won in return for sexual intercourse from the knicker who wants to engage in sexual intercourse, and had the knick, a sexual traffic woman, do the sexual intercourse with the above male guest.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

2. If a foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act intends to find a job in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and no person shall employ a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a commercial sex acts business with the trade name, “C Magaz,” as stated in the above paragraph (1), and employed Thailand, which was introduced by the “L” person who is an employment broker, and the female of Kazakh, who was aware of the fact that he did not have the status of stay that he/she could engage in job-seeking activities, as a female employee of the said business establishment, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against J, D, H, and F;

1. Police seizure records;

1. To bring an accusation against an immigration offender at the request of an investigative agency against on-site photograph, a suspect in violation of each immigration control Act;

arrow