logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.03.26 2019고단2713
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, this paper deals with the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B are operators operating commercial sex acts in the name of "E" on the 5th floor of the petition-gu, the petition-gu, and the defendant C is employees of the above commercial sex acts establishments.

1. From the beginning of June 2019 to the beginning of September 21, 2019, the Defendants conspired to employ Thai female F, G, as female employees of the said business establishment, H, I, and J as the head office of the said business establishment, after having employed Thai female F, G, as female employees of the said business establishment, H, I, and J as the head office of the said business, the Defendants received 130,000 won per person in return for sexual traffic from the unspecified number of male customers and had sexual intercourse with the said F, G.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange commercial sex acts for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act by Defendant A shall employ any foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, from August 28, 2019 to September 9, 2019, the Defendant: (a) entered the said “E”); (b) from around January 26, 2019 to around January 26, 2019; (c) from around September 5, 2019 to around September 9, 2019, the Defendant, who did not have the status of stay eligible for visa exemption (B-1); (d) entered into the country’s nationality to around September 1, 2019, and did not have the status of stay eligible for visa exemption (B-1); (e) the Defendant, from around October 20, 2019 to around September 14, 2019, did not have the status of stay eligible for visa exemption (B-1); and (e) the Defendant, from around October 20, 2019 to around September 10, 2019, did not have the status of stay; and (e) the Defendant, did not have the status of stay;

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow