Whether the address of the person liable for registration indicated differently from the address on the registry becomes the subject of a judgment or rectification.

Even if the address and the address of the person liable for registration indicated in the judgment are different, if it is attested by the resident registration card, etc. that the person is the same person, it is possible to register, and there is no reason to correct the judgment by failing to indicate the address on the register of the person.

Article 197 of the Civil Procedure Act

Attorney Kim Sang-sung, Counsel for the special appellant

Seoul District Court Order 86Ka21150 Dated December 11, 1986

The special appeal is dismissed.

With respect to special grounds for appeal:

According to the records, when a special appellant filed a lawsuit for ownership transfer registration against a person other than the appellant as a co-Plaintiff, he did not enter the address on the register other than the appellant in the address of the appellant, and the court rendered a judgment ordering the performance of registration in accordance with the purport of the complaint and stated the defendant's address in accordance with the indication of the address. However, even if the address of the person liable for registration indicated in the judgment differs from the address of the registry, if it is proved by the resident registration card, etc. that the person liable for registration is the same person, if it is proved by the resident registration card, etc., it is possible to register, and there is no reason that the special appellant did not correct the judgment because he did not indicate the defendant's address on the registry as it is. Therefore, there

Therefore, the special appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices O Sung-sung (Presiding Justice)